- Journal Name: Scientific Thought
- Short Name: ST
- ISSN(Print) : 3080-4221
- ISSN (Online) : 3080-423X
- Frequency : Semi-Annual
- Nature: Print and Online
- Submission: Via OJS System
- Languages of Publication: English
- Review Type: Triple Blind Peer Review
Ethical Policy
Scientific Thought is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to exploring the intersection of biosciences, applied science, and scientific methodology. The journal is committed to upholding the highest standards of ethical conduct in the publication of scholarly work, ensuring the integrity and transparency of the research process.
1. Research Involving Human Subjects
All research involving human participants, human material, or human data must have been performed in accordance with the principles stated in the Declaration of Helsinki [1].
1.1. Ethical Approval and Consent
• Mandatory Approval: Authors must ensure that proper ethical approval was obtained from relevant ethics committees before the research began.
• Informed Consent: Written informed consent must be obtained from human participants when required.
• Manuscript Statement: The manuscript must include a statement confirming that ethical approval was obtained and detailing the approving body.
2. Research Involving Animals
If the research involves animals, authors must ensure that proper ethical approval was obtained from relevant ethics committees.
• Mandatory Approval: Authors must confirm that all procedures were approved by an appropriate ethics committee.
• Reporting: The manuscript must include a statement confirming compliance with ethical standards for animal research.
3. Data Integrity and Accuracy
Authors must ensure the accuracy and integrity of the data presented in their manuscripts. Fabrication or manipulation of data will not be tolerated. Authors are responsible for the findings and conclusions presented in their work.
4. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses must be registered in a publicly accessible database (e.g., PROSPERO) prior to commencing the review. Furthermore, the reporting of these studies must strictly follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [2] to ensure transparency and completeness in the methodology and findings.
5. Authorship and Conflicts of Interest
Scientific Thought adheres to strict guidelines regarding authorship and conflicts of interest. All individuals who have made substantial contributions must be listed as authors, and all authors must disclose any financial, personal, or professional conflicts of interest that might influence the research or publication.
References
[1] World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki [2] PRISMA Statement [3] Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) [4] International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
